Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category
President Obama made an historic speech on June 4, 2009 at Cairo University in Cairo Egypt. Popularly known as Obama’s “Speech to the Muslim World,” this speech touched on topics from democracy in the middle east to the Israel-Palistinian Conflict, to the Taliban War in Pakistan. As predicted, those who truly seek peace liked the speech, and those who seek a continuance of conflict and religious hatred, disliked the speech.
See the video of Obama’s Cairo Speech and read the text of his address to the Muslim world at the link below:
http://www.historyguy.com/politics/obama_cairo_speech_to_muslim_world_text_video_june_2009.htm
President
Obama’s Afghanistan Strategy (2009)
On March 27, 2009, President Obama, flanked by
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of
Defense Robert Gates, announced his new strategy toward
the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The video
of his announcement and the text of President Obama’s
announcement, with links, are at http://www.historyguy.com/obama_afghanistan_strategy_2009.htm
President Barack Obama, on the second full day of his presidency signed executive orders related to dealing the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay and the prisoners held there.
Below are links to pages with the text of President Obama’s three executive orders dealing with the topic of Guantanamo and the prisoners.
http://www.obamapresidency.us.com/obama_executive_order_closing_guantanamo_prison_01.22.09 : deals with the closure of the prison facilities at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, where prisoners from the War on Terror were held.
http://www.obamapresidency.us.com/obama_executive_order_review_detention_policy_options_01.22.09: calling for a review of the policies put in place by the Bush Administration dealing with the detention, trial, transfer, release, or other disposition
http://www.obamapresidency.us.com/obama_executive_order_ensuring_lawful_interrogations_01.22.09: ensuring the lawful interrogation of prisoners seized in the War on Terror.
Bush and Obama cabinet member, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, is trying to keep a significant number of the Bush administration political appointees to remain on the jobs at the Pentagon until the incoming Obama administration finds replacements. This unusual move is intended to prevent a leadership vacuum at among the military’s civilian leadership as the U.S. wages war on two major fronts; Iraq and Afghanistan.
Gates confirmed that the Obama Transition Team is on board with his attempts to prevent a vacuum at the Pentagon as with the change in adminstrations, as is usually the case at all federal agencies and departments. Gates intend to keep, at least temporarily, most of the service secretaries and undersecretaries, whose replacements will need Senate confirmation. Senate confirmation is a process which often takes months.
Senior officials asked to stay include John Young, undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, and James R. Clapper, undersecretary of defense for intelligence.
While this move is obviously done for practical reasons, (the fact the U.S. is deeply in war, and this will not change quickly), some anti-war activists and bloggers are voicing displeasure at the apparent turnabout by Obama in keeping so-called neoconservatives and Hawks in positions of authority in the civilian leadership at the Pentagon. Obama may be seeking to avoid public battles with the military establishment early on, as is belived at http://www.openleft.com/, but most likely, he is doing whatever he can to prevent costly national security mistakes or omissions if dozens of Pentagon positions go unfilled for the first few months of 2009. This appears to be a practical move on the part of President-Elect Obama.
With the blogosphere heating up with criticism of Barack Obama’s expensive Hawaii vacation rental digs (http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/1222081obama1.html), and negative comments on the money being spent on his trip, especially the government funds paid for Secret Service bodyguards, and the ongoing Blagojevich scandal, what is the likelihood that the new President-Elect will use part of his vacation time to visit the troops in the war zones?
Such a bold (though hardly unprecedented) move would certainly shake things up. Using Hawaii as his launching pad, Obama could jet over to Afghanistan and Iraq to share Christmas and Hanukkah meals with our men and women over there. How would the President-Elect benefit from such a trip? One, he would cancel any nascent criticism of his choice of vacation locations and the high cost of this trip in bad economic times, if he could show it as being “job-related” . Second, it would put all other political news on the back burner, particularly the Blagojevich scandal back in his home town of Chicago. It would also serve to void the stupid argument between Dick Cheney and Joe Biden that is currently filling the political talk shows. More importantly, such a visit would help shore up Obama’s thin foreign policy resume and show that he puts the needs of American troops above his own needs, such as improving his golf game. And, after much talk and publicity over the domestic economic crisis, Obama needs to show leadership on the war front.
The last time the U.S. had a presidential election in which neither the sitting president nor vice-president ran was in 1952. Then, the nation was in the midst of a fairly unpopular war which is often now referred to as “The Forgotten War.” President-Elect Dwight Eisenhower visited the troops in Korea after winning the election. It was the right thing for Eisenhower to do, and it will be the right thing for Obama to do as well.
